For an idea of what it supposed to be an editor inside the days when I became desiring to be one in remote 1968 and how that role has changed on account that, one wishes to study how publishing has essentially modified. Publishing then turned into appeared to be a profession virtually differentiated from a commercial enterprise: a gentleperson’s genteel engagement with earning a residing, but pretty much achieving the latter. Very few humans knew what a publishing career meant so it had a positive cachet, specifically whilst you threw in mysteriously that it had to do with books, a good greater mysterious commodity, provided you probably did not want to reveal what you virtually earned; thankfully, not many stooped to ask you that, at the least on casual touch.
Publishing then become a low-key, low-paid career shorn of the razzamatazz that surrounds it nowadays, however those inside it believed they have been acting a provider of tremendous price and carefully enjoyed engaging with it. Notwithstanding the low salaries there was very little group of workers turnover. I every so often mourned that if no person left, there might be no room on the pinnacle to which to aspire!
Having broadly set the scene we come to what the editor simply did. As in all professions, wherein you figure and with whom makes an vast difference for your functioning and obligations. I in my opinion labored for simplest two publishers: first with Orient Longman (OL), because the Orient BlackSwan of these days was then known (three years), and Oxford University Press India (OUP).
Fortunately, and in a sense enormously, both, inside the important, functioned greater or less identically. Both had a head office in Delhi and department workplaces in Bombay, Madras, and Calcutta, and every had an academic/wellknown listing which attempted to earn its preserve and greater however there has been no acute scrutiny of that as it turned into the flagship or loss-leader. The actual profits got here from (1) the educational listing (college and college textbooks), annotated university anthologies prescribed by using numerous nation educational forums (if there has been a somewhat seamier facet, this became it!), and supplementary studying fabric; and (2) reprints of reference cloth (dictionaries in the primary), at various degrees, largely generated by the respective UK determine businesses (although OUP stoutly maintained that it became not a corporation but a branch of the University of Oxford, and we wore that as a badge of honour! And tried to live up to it).
In OL then there was no strict bifurcation between the instructional/fashionable and educational departments so an editor can be concurrently running on educational/wellknown and educational books, despite the fact that typically a vast bifurcation occurred depending upon competencies and desire; in OUP specific editors were assigned to each branch however come the remaining minute rush preceding the instructional year and maximum editors pitched in with the instructional list, the educational/ general editors normally operating on supplementary studying fabric. There become no specialisation inside those vast categories both until later years while it crept in to a point.
As a largely instructional/standard editor, in OUP I was both assigned a manuscript with the aid of the then chief editor/trendy supervisor (Ravi Dayal whilst GM, for plenty very fruitful years, blended those roles) or generated it myself on the basis of an idea or notion, with of path the concurrence of the previous, and in which essential a expert record. There were visits to the college for concept and bookshops for remarks.
Manuscript in hand you have been in your own with none external interference, no time stress except from inside and every now and then from the writer.
Ivor Lewis for instance, a captivating sprightly individual of 80+ years from the Isle of Wight, who became a extremely good buddy and spoke eloquently about the charms of the nuns on the convent where he stayed whilst in India, was forever threatening to die and as soon as, just as we were drawing near the give up (not of him but the e book!), in a kingdom of despair, wrote lightheartedly that he would sue me. Then it was an severe 6-to-8-month engagement (although Irfan Habib’s An Atlas of the Mughal Empire took three gruelling years and Ivor Lewis’s Sahibs, Nabobs and Boxwallahs, two!) with the MS to be edited, specific queries and tips exchanged with the author, the focal point on expression and presentation but also on shape, discrepancies, repetition.
Then the proofs arrived and moved among editor and author, accompanied through cautiously crafted letters, drafted and typed, with more queries, pleasantries, and humour, imparting the author, frequently anxious and impatient, persevering with reassurance and guide. The dating at this factor was frequently very severe, albeit transitory.
In addition to the interplay with the author there was close coordination with the manufacturing branch. I became extraordinarily lucky for maximum of my time at OUP to have the able and sage steering of DipenMitra, a soulmate, as production manager.
They did the costings, selected the typeface, designed the text, and selected the most suitable press. When considered necessary, the clicking become collectively visited in which I became privileged to observe the magical sight of molten metal pouring all the way down to shape letters and bypass thru successive generations of evolving technology: hand putting, monotype, linotype and admire the extremely good abilities of the people who operated them and once in a while rescued us from the brink of disaster. Sadly, a sterling and demise breed of specialists defeated handiest by means of generation. Publishing and printing presses had been then inextricably intertwined.
Those are glimpses of the past, what of the existing? I have located that in publishing it become first of all the editors who were in control, and that became the duration with which I certainly empathise, then the baton passed to the accountants, and finally to the sales and advertising humans who have due to the fact maintained a stranglehold.
Although from a in simple terms economic point of view the present arrangement makes eminent sense, need to publishing be difficulty to in simple terms economic criteria? Does publishing in its present shape properly play its essential role of getting the writer at the centre and providing the mutually enriching offerings essential to enable the organisation to get the best out of him/her and submit the great feasible books inside the maximum attractive form possible?
What delivered about this dramatic alternate in the shape of publishing and even inflamed the famend college presses whose fundamental function it’s far to nurture authors and scholarship. Some time inside the Eighties I assume, publishers remote places, accompanied astonishingly even via the famend college presses, decided that having copyeditors on their payroll was a waste of cash. They occupied an excessive amount of high priced space, spent far an excessive amount of time disturbing approximately commas and cut up infinitives, so why not rent them in their personal space at costs they (the publishers) thought they had been really worth. They succeeded in a few measure due to the fact in consequence there have been masses of skilled copyeditors at the limb with few different options. Also, given the size of a lot of their operations they had been able to have a whole department tracking the overall performance in their outside copyeditors. OUP UK, as an instance, which inside the first flush of enthusiasm fired a giant take hold of of wonderful editors, has I agree with an complicated and thoroughly-organised one.
A decade later, when the Indian general managers, via now rechristened dealing with administrators! With a history in sales and advertising, and not using a hobby in or inclination to fight for the traditional independence of the Indian department operations, this organisational blueprint became transported to India.
To my thoughts this become a completely out of place flow; the situation in India turned into very specific. There have been rather few skilled editors and with the version being followed through a huge variety of publishers, the catchment too slim. In OUP we ought to by way of no stretch of the creativeness declare to have had the fine editors but what changed into crucial became that they had been on the payroll and responsible to the management and the authors for the books they produced and how they produced them. A reasonably capable in-residence editor, responsible to the enterprise for results, I assume, produces better effects than someone out of the blue, normally underpaid, under-certified, and no sanction beyond not getting a second undertaking from a particular publisher. I might imagine, and given my enjoy as a freelance editor of more than one a long time, the commissioning editors of nowadays frequently do now not have the time or the capability to assess the first-class of the work offered.
I had evidently visible those winds of exchange and decided that my hobby in working on manuscripts a ways surpassed that of merely planning and soliciting them. Perhaps the nature of the trade can first-rate be illustrated by a short alternate I had with a charming woman from OUP’s International Division at a party to welcome her to India. Touching at the destiny, she informed me with the maximum gravity: “You will not be an editor you’ll be a product packaging supervisor.”
Needless to say, an awful lot as I respect folks who tirelessly and wonderfully package deal our goods, I did not envisage that as my future. My new avatar overnight as a freelance copyeditor become rather daunting with best a meagre provident fund and gratuity within the bank, and people took a month or greater to arrive. I turned into rescued by means of my editorial colleagues in OUP, first RukunAdvani, the then editorial director, academic and trendy, and when he himself resigned, NitashaDevasar, who saved me nearly always in work, albeit at the near hunger wages that had been then to be had, for over a decade.
A freelance editor does no longer must put together him/herself to rush to office in the morning, has the luxurious of operating uninterrupted inside the consolation of domestic, can pay attention single-mindedly. On the opposite hand, there may be an obligation to adhere to prescribed schedules, there may be no assure that the morrow will see a manuscript on the table, and if, as I do, s/he works on a single manuscript at a time, promising offers should be declined, and it’s miles extra than possibly that during consequence observe-up ones will not be forthcoming. The other drawback is that except you are operating at once for an author there is no contact with her/him in any respect.
The commissioning editor emails a manuscript, you edit and return it with broad comments and suggestions, text-associated queries highlighted in the text, e-mail it back, and watch for a cheque to reach a month or so later! You, more frequently than now not, do not know what the book looks as if, whilst it’s far published, how it changed into obtained/reviewed. When a trifle diffidently (time had exceeded, memories had been hazy) I agreed to write down this piece, the first few lines were tapped out on my cellular phone on a Saturday afternoon at the bar of the India International Centre.
A little Dutch braveness is always beneficial in igniting resolve! This is handiest applicable here because it vividly illustrates how generation has dramatically modified the palate in phrases of the editorial function, communique, and writer-editor interpersonal relations, in large part for the higher, clearly for convenience and efficiency, and in a few respects possibly for the more serious. Throughout my years with OUP there were no computers whatsoever, except all through the previous few years whilst a large, good-looking standalone Mackintosh was acquired for layout purposes which I widespread from a safe distance! Then the whole thing was accomplished via hand. Manuscripts (ironically, the very phrase means e-book written by using hand) were edited with fountain pen or ballpen, depending upon preference, proofs had been corrected within the same way, letters had been carefully crafted by means of hand unless you had a area of expertise for dictation, and then typed and retyped.
For years after computers became omnipresent and ubiquitous, I obstinately maintained that modifying through hand produced advanced consequences because the gradual pace of the operation accepted extra time for notion and consideration.
It was only quite past due into my editorial freelancing days that I bought a laptop on a whim and became persuaded with the aid of its convenience, and that conversion itself become gradual, for some years both techniques going hand-in-hand, relying upon clients’ options. Today I would regard tough reproduction as an great imposition but nevertheless pass over the ease of flipping the pages forwards and backwards. How times change!
Another large exchange that era brings is the instantaneous availability of records. While in the past the editor scoured her/his reference shelf, and people of others, for references/phrases/meanings or queried the author, today the click of a button and there in your mobile phone is your dictionary, word list, Wikipedia, Google, the ultimate giving start to that frightful time period “googled”.
Again every other principal change wrought with the aid of era is in writer-editor interpersonal family members. Because within the past correspondence, each inside the writing and its conveyance (with the standard postman a celeb actor), turned into a lot extra time-eating and rare, if utilised effectively it may create a extraordinary bond among author and editor. It is tough to copy the identical personalized impact with these days’s instantaneous electronic communique, which has taken a toll too at the art of correspondence and the delight of receiving a letter. Alas, not can “Lost inside the mail” be proffered as a handy excuse. On the fine facet, all of us is constantly in contact with anybody else which, if it lacks magic it’s far handy and efficient but with that comes the charge of an sizable overload of records that’s frequently tough to digest and maximally utilise.
In conclusion, a couple of mind and questions run via my mind. Where will destiny generations of copyeditors come from and with what historical past? Will future generations of commissioning editors be in a role to assess the fine of copyedited manuscripts they acquire? What effect will the brand new arrangement have at the conventional, together enriching dating that existed between the author, the editor and the publisher, now that the features of the conventional editor have been cleft in half?